Demolishing Moscow

News about demolitions costantly come from Moscow, were the efforts of citizens and organizations as Arhnadzor, can’t stop the pressure of real estate market oligarchy, of which the main esponent is the wife of the mayor itself. No surprise that in this situation, organs due to preserve architectural heritage, as the Moscow heritage committee (Moskonansledie) do not really struggle to do their job…

Alexeev Mansion, 11 Bakhrushina Street demolished on July 25th
The building
www.archnadzor.ru
http://archnadzor.livejournal.com/
Interview with Arhnadzor

Moskonansledie_cultural heritage committee

The main goal of our third and conclusive visit to Moscow was to meet and interview some representatives of Moscow Government, and namely  Moscomansledie, the municipal agency in charge of preserving cultural heritage in the Russian Capital. It is the only relevant actor in the story of the Narkomfin, which we did not have the possibility to meet and interview during our visits. Moscomansledie is often called in cause by other interviewees, but in general  it stands out for its absence: self-evidently the Narkomfin is affected by lack of maintenance interventions, which a public agency in charge of preserving cultural patrimony should provide.

Through our local executive producer, we contacted Moskonansledie few weeks before our trip for an interview. The officers did not object to it, but we have been asked for an official written request, which we provided. Once in Moscow, we have been invited to a preliminary meeting in order to clarify the goal of our interview. Eventually, we met with two employees, in an old house of merchant -now the representative office of Moskonansledie- apparently emptied of other employees and human presence. They cautiously questioned us about the nature of our project and goals, and how we would  use this interview etc. We clarified in detail our background, our artistic and scientific approach, the reason for our involvement in this project about Moscow, how we are proceeding with our documentary project and the  interviews previously done. They required us to submit a list of questions that would have been asked during the interview, and promised us an answer asap. They did not assure us to release the interview, but they told us that it should be possible. We left with the confirmation of our impression regarding Russian public institutions as  an highly opaque bureaucratic machine. For the rest of the week, we have been pointlessly waiting   for an appointment. Not that they refused. Actually, our official request for an interview has been accepted, and signed by the Director of Moskomansledie.  But since then, everyday we received a message that may be the day after a meeting for the interview could have been arranged, which in the end never took place. Simply, in five days, they have not been able to find who among the “technicians” of  the public agency could be available for interview.

From our point of view, it’s not a big problem. Not that we think that the responses of Moskomansledie could have added so much to the film we are making! But, having had the opportunity to listen to so many voices telling us about the Narkomfin building and contemporary Moscow, from the descendants of Ginsburg and Milyutin -the extraordinary persons  which realized such a masterpiece-, to the inhabitants still living inside the building, from architects and scholars who are struggling for preserving its memory and conditions, to the entrepreneur who has bought most of the apartments to redevelop the building for commercial purposes, we have a quite definite view of the story. From these people narrations, and from our direct observations of the events, the image of Moscow’s institution does not appear chrystal clear, and its role appears biased and disputable. For the sake of correctness, we asked them to give their point of view. We have openly expressed our curiosities and perplexities to Moskomansledie’s representant, and if they don’t consider important to respond publicly, they are just  providing another mosaic piece for the picture, implicitly confirming many of the impressions captured in Moscow in particular about the Governmental agencies as being inefficient, disregarding their basic tasks, and strongly influenced by private interests.

NARKOMFIN – RUSSIAN TELEVISION

NARKOMFIN – RUSSIAN TELEVISION from OGINO KNAUSS on Vimeo.

Back to Moscow

We are back again to Moscow. This time hot weather is accompanying us; an unusual hot season slows down even the constant flux of Muscovites in the streets. The Narkomfin itself seems to suffer even more the brightness of the sun light in the cracks of the walls. The big trees around the building are somehow soothing it. The Narkomfin is tiny and crowned by luxuriant vegetation, which seems to be a precious paradise in the surroundings made by huge and imposing multi-story buildings such as the American Embassy and wide 16 lanes urban road.

Nastya has already surveyed the place, and discovered some new developments of the story. Since few week there is a guard checking the Narkomfin. The guardian is a new entry and it was not there when we came last time.  He has been friendly with her  and promised to help us to meet the inhabitants.

We wait calmly under the trees the guardian of the Narkomfin, with the hope of him letting us into the building. After few minutes he appears: a sturdy but not tall man on his thirties with a big scar on the left chick, dark tattoos on the calves, and round peaceful face that did not fit with the military style clothes. He smiles sweetly when he clarifies to the translator that we are not allowed to enter the building. He does not want to be interviewed, and therefore we are not allowed to know for whom he is employed, who is representing and what is his duty at the Narkomfin. he only tells us that there vhave been a scandal about manouvres made at the Narkomfin, fueled by a TV report.

Good start! Things become more and more confused…


At this point of the story, we know that there are few residents living in the building. Some of them are renters of the public estate now in the hands of the local government. Some others are owners of flats acquired through usufruct or purchased.  All the residents who could afford better housing conditions left for the peripheries and for better-equipped flats long ago.

Despite the denial of the guardian to let us inside the building, we can hang about the entrance and wait for some residents to pass by, somebody possibly sympathetic with us and approachable to video interview. The first passer-by is a man in his fifties, who accepts to talk but he quickly dismisses us with few words telling about the general Narkomfin’story repeating the mantra of the missed restoration works. Nothing new.

By chance after few minutes, we have another resident, who tells us that he has been living there for 30 years. His father once moved in the Narkomfin with the intention of residing there only three years but eventually he spent there all his life.  V. -our interviewee- tells about the Narkomfin out of his teen-ager’s memory, when the building was overcrowded by families who lived crammed in the apartments and by people who inhabited modest rooms without natural light and water put up in the left over spaces at the ends of the corridors. People living in this kind of spaces were obliged to depend on others people apartment for cooking and washing up. After all, this was the only way to use all the available space in a time of housing shortage, when also the ground floor under pilotis was overbuilt with new flats. By the end of the eighties, the Narkomfin ended his demographic upsurge. After the end communist period, the building turned toward a fate of continuous decay, inhabited by scattered families who have no decision making power regarding the destiny of the building.

During the interview a grouping of few people assembled near the entrance. They are young, trendy and speak English. That’s when we got to learn that there are new inhabitants in the building…

The construction of Narkomfin

Narkomfin_M. Ginzburg in the building site
Narkomfin_building site_1930
Narkomfin_building site_1930

from Milyutin family archive
With courtesy of Ekaterina Milyutina – NLO Publishers, Moscow